The Architectural Competition
![]() |
Winning Competition: ‘Death is not the end’ |
Within the scope of the class ‘Special Topics in Design and Architecture: Tokyo’, we had to produce an essay of our choosing. The essay had to show a
culmination of the ideas we explored in class whilst introducing something
new. Using The Arch Out Loud Open Ideas
Competition, I looked at the
competition landscape and the discursive nature of architectural visions
interrogating the following questions:
Where is the competition situated in
contemporary social discourse?
What do they say about Tokyo? What
meanings do they give the city?
Are they discursive events? Are they
knowledge producers?
Above all, I sought to highlight two
unanswerable questions originally posed by Sorensen. Firstly, have plans played
a role in shaping urban planning, architecture and governance? Secondly, do
radical urban visions have potential to shape the city by inspiring action and
imagining alternative futures? (Sorensen, 2017).
Architecture
is not manifest solely in the built form, but is made and re-made through
visions, plans and competitions which collect as discursive data of
architectural history. The built form we see today is but a portion of the
ideas that have become realised. Great plans such as Abercrombie’s Plan for London, Tange’s
Plan for Tokyo Bay and the work of Archigram have reverberated and gained
legacy beyond many tangible alternatives. Plans are not only seductive
visually, they also offer a glance into prevalent forces and ideologies in
society. They can be situated within a place and a time and as such, can be
illustrative of how ideas circulate, travel and are re-interpreted. They can
act as a history of design discourse. From a purely material perspective, these
large creative data sets have a potential to show a lineage of current design
thinking that exposes the shape, problems and aspirations of society. Competition
narratives utilise the notion that architecture is a problem-solving tool, and that
the site of the competition is a space for innovation where alternative futures
can be experimented with.
Arch
out Loud created a competition under the Open Ideas branch of its research
entitled ‘Death and the City: Tokyo Vertical Cemetery’. The architectural
research association has a history of proposing plans that interrogate controversial
phenomenon such as the nuclear waste disposal site and mixed housing in Mumbai;
arguing that these competitions ‘demand[ing] the constant rethinking of former
ideologies.’ (Arch out Loud, 2015).
Seeking
‘to explore innovative solutions, find better alternatives to convention and invigorate
the field of design’, the brief itself was to propose a vertical cemetery in Shinjuku
that ‘explores the relationship between life and death within the city… and the
cultural identity this can project within its environment’ (Arch out Loud, 2015).
It is proposed under the premise that architecture can find alternative solutions whilst enriching cultural dialogue.
Utilising
Smith’s ‘city as problem’ thesis (Smith,1978), the brief for Death and the City
was set in response to ‘Meigi-Gashi’, highlighting the architectural
competition as a tool for social critique (Larson, 1994). With rising land costs in Tokyo, private developers have
used temple names to build cemetery plots next to houses, selling the graves
for ten times the price of the land without taxes.
A backlash has occurred with NIMBY residents critiquing the
influx of graves. As people continue to flock to the city
and the overall population rises, the problem is due to worsen. This addresses spatial
constraints whilst simultaneously criticising the social-spatial
phenomenon of Meigi-Gashi, highlighting how the architectural competition becomes
a discursive event’ (Larson, 1994).
![]() |
Impression for ‘Death is not the end' |
![]() |
Drawing for ‘Death is not the end’ |
![]() |
Kurt Perschke's Work |
As
the balloon rises, a person is gradually being forgotten:
‘Whenever friends and families come to
visit, the balloon pauses. If no visitor comes, the balloon keeps rising.
Eventually, when the optical fibres reach the end, the balloon flies to the sky
until blowing off in the atmosphere. While traveling back from the atmosphere,
the inner layer of oxidizer coating will ignite the whole balloon in the sky.
With the rain and the wind, the ashes travels back to the earth.’
The
work questions ideas of attachment, memory, forgetting and value. The authors wanted the movement of balloons, appearing and
disappearing to reflect the temporality of life. Here it speaks to Smith’s idea
about ‘the city as process’ or ‘ephemeron’ (ukiyo) – affirming the Shinto
concept of cyclical renewal and Buddhist’s impermanence (Smith, 1978). The balloons floating up
into the sky are reminiscent of the Obon Lantern Festival whereby families send
their ancestor’s spirits back to their resting place under the guidance of
fire. This fire (Okuribi) is matched in the red-ness of the balloons. Okuribi marks the closing of the Obon Lantern Festival much like the balloons reaching the sky
marks the final moment in the bodies journey.
These
plans pursue an increasing connection between technology and space and our experience
of it. This arguably builds and follows on from discourse surrounding Shinjuku
Ruriko-in Byakurenge-do in Shinjuku, employing a technological fix to address
issues of death and space. For approximately $100,000, individuals can have their loved ones cremated and their ashes stored in an example of a vertical cemetery. Using technology developed by Toyota Industries, electronic ID cards light up the urns of the dead for visitors to contemplate.
![]() |
Exterior of Shinjuku Ruriko-in Byakurenge-do, Shinjuku |
![]() |
Suisho-Den Room at Shinjuku Ruriko-in Byakurenge-do, Shinjuku |
There is an increasing debate about the meaning and problem of excess and storage. This issue of excess is reflected both in architecture and space-body relations. Architecture possesses an abundance of excess material, through waste, plans and models. Yet through this competition, architecture attempts to address the excesses of life.
References:
Arch out
loud. www.archoutloud.com/-purpose.html
Arch
out loud Report, http://www.archoutloud.com/tok-results.html
Larson.,
M, S (1994) Architectural Competitions as Discursive Events, Theory and Society, 23, 4: 469-504.
Smith,
H, D (1978) Tokyo as an Idea: An Exploration of Japanese Urban Thought until
1945, The Journal of Japanese Studies,
4, 1, 45-80.
Sorensen,
A (2017) Future Visions of Tokyo that Mattered: Utopian concepts and
unanticipated outcomes, in Urban Asias: Essay on Futurity Past and Present, ed.
T. Bunnell and D.P.S. Goh, Berlin: Jovis.
Comments
Post a Comment